Skip to content

Civilized Discussion on Religion & Politics

When meeting someone after many years, there aren’t many times I would recommend discussing religion and politics but that was part of a rather pleasant conversation I found myself in recently. My friend’s mother who I possibly had not seen since my high school years was genuinely curious about how I felt about the aforementioned topics but that left me in a curious spot about whether I should say the politically correct answer or go with what I really felt. I decided that since my friend usually has no filter and is often pretty blunt with statements, it would probably make sense to go with the no non-sense, brutally honest approach in hopes of having a genuinely good dialogue… and I’m glad I did.

One of the first things I was asked was what my religion was and subsequently a follow-up on what my thoughts were about how I was treated in the immediate aftermath of 9/11 – much of which I already provided in greater details (September 11th Aftermath – My Story) on how I was treated but can be summarized that no matter how great everyone may be, there are always a few bad apples which you can’t always avoid. As we continued the discussion, we moved onto topics about why groups like al-Qaeda on what I thought about their affiliation with the religion immediately made me think of a reference back to West Wing that I used and which I have linked below:

The conversation did take a turn towards racial profiling and when it may be beneficial for authorities to do their jobs without sacrificing civil liberties or breaking laws. Having agreed on majority of the topics of discussion like the treatment of Muslims after 9/11 and how religious fundamentalists isn’t limited to just Islam, I would say the one thing I did disagree on was the effective use of racial profiling in catching criminals or potential-criminals. One thing that I took away immediately was having to explain the difference between the terms Islam and Muslims which is maybe something I took for granted.

Regardless, it was simply enjoyable to have a civil conversation with people I don’t regularly speak to on topics that have the potential to get very heated and one, that I hope I could have again in the future.

Posted in Academy, Politics.

Tagged with , , , , , , , , , .

7 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. xlt futures trading says

    They were also the first to make the Madrassa system a public domain under the control of the Caliph. The Nizamiyya madrasa is considered by consensus of scholars to be the earliest surviving school, built towards 1066 AD by Emir Nizam Al-Mulk.[

  2. Sugar Land Limo says

    I'm not going to say what everyone else has already said, but I do want to comment on your knowledge of the topic. You're truly well-informed. I cant believe how much

  3. EvTezcan89 says

    Interesting article, a lot of cool information here.

    Online Payday Loan

  4. Ismail says

    While I agree with the comparison of the KKK to violent Islamic extremists, I don't agree with the idea that Islamic extremism equates to following 7th century Islamic law. Muslims are supposed to pray and men should wear beards (whether they should be forced to do so is the real question).

    These 7th century Islamic laws are what Islam is made up of. Perhaps a better explanation would have been the interpretation of some groups of these laws.

    But one of the basic fundamentals of Islam is our belief in One God only. That is one of those 7th century laws that do not equal Islamic extremism.

  5. Bondsman says

    I didn't know you could have civilizes discussion on politics or religion! I can't even do that with my family. Arlington bail bonds Jay

  6. Boarding School says

    make solid discussion on Religion & Politics

  7. moving to costa rica says

    I find very useful education in Discussion on Religion & Politics

Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.